Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Arcosa, Inc.
How Arcosa, Inc. stacks up
ACA · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
54/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #148 of 473 · scores higher than 68% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including ACA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 54?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 66% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.8% vs peer median 3.7%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 6.7% vs peer median 3.8%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 6.9% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ACA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ACA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 2.7% | 3.0% | 45% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 6.5% | 6.3% | 53% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 1.8% | 3.3% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 40.7% | 32.3% | 60% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ACA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 141 | 984M USD | 55 | 39 | |
| 141 | 78.2B USD | 55 | 52 | |
| 141 | 29.2B USD | 55 | 50 | |
| 141 | 10.3B USD | 55 | 57 | |
| 148 | 7.3B USD | 54 | 72 | |
| 148 | 15.4B USD | 54 | 54 | |
| 148 | 11.2B USD | 54 | 70 | |
| 148 | 3.5B USD | 54 | 63 | |
| 148 | 1.1B USD | 54 | 64 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score