Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zumiez Inc.
How Zumiez Inc. stacks up
ZUMZ · against 331 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
68/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #125 of 332 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score34 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including ZUMZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 68?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 12.1% vs peer median 8.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 11.4% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZUMZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZUMZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 318 reported | 4.6% | 3.6% | 55% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 339 reported | 12.1% | 9.5% | 59% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 112 reported | 11.4% | 6.5% | 63% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 319 reported | 123.2% | 79.2% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZUMZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 130M EUR (≈$143M) | 100 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1.1B HKD (≈$137M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 123 | 386M EUR (≈$424M) | 69 | 33 | |
| 125 | 2.8B CNY (≈$391M) | 68 | 69 | |
| 125 | 542M SAR (≈$146M) | 68 | 50 | |
| 125 | 3.8B SEK (≈$381M) | 68 | 62 | |
| 125 | 219M USD | 68 | 56 | |
| 129 | 1.6B HKD (≈$200M) | 67 | 68 | |
| 129 | 454M SGD (≈$345M) | 67 | 59 | |
| 129 | 6.3B TWD (≈$195M) | 67 | 57 | |
| 132 | 41.7B JPY (≈$284M) | 66 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score