Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zoetis Inc.
How Zoetis Inc. stacks up
ZTS · against 1,216 other Healthcare companies
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #701 of 1,217 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score121 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including ZTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Healthcare companies.Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 66% of peers. Revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 6.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 5.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 9.2% vs peer median 9.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZTS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,243 reported | 1.6% | 6.1% | 34% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 682 reported | 9.2% | 9.7% | 50% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,192 reported | 5.0% | 5.8% | 47% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZTS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.1B EUR (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 100 | |
| 1 | 464M USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 3 | 8.9B HKD (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 3 | 1.8B HKD (≈$224M) | 99 | 59 | |
| 3 | 7.2B TWD (≈$224M) | 99 | 41 | |
| 701 | 95.4B AUD (≈$62.9B) | 42 | 48 | |
| 701 | 965M EUR (≈$1.1B) | 42 | 37 | |
| 701 | 1.1B USD | 42 | 43 | |
| 701 | 174.8B INR (≈$2.1B) | 42 | 73 | |
| 701 | 34.3B USD | 42 | 57 | |
| 713 | 47.7B CNY (≈$6.7B) | 41 | 64 | |
| 713 | 250.4B KRW (≈$180M) | 41 | 60 | |
| 713 | 22.0B CNY (≈$3.1B) | 41 | 67 | |
| 713 | 3.1B HKD (≈$396M) | 41 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score