Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZS · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,326 of 1,667 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including ZS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
| Metric | ZS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -0.2% | 2.3% | 25% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 0.1% | 4.3% | 20% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 2.1% | 2.7% | 45% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 7.1% | 33.4% | 8% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,326 | 2.0B USD | 20 | 35 | |
| 1,326 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 8.7B USD |
| 20 |
| 43 |
| 1,326 | 286.5B USD | 20 | 39 |
| 1,326 | 145M SEK (≈$14M) | 20 | 17 |
| 1,326 | 36.7B USD | 20 | 36 |
| 1,343 | 35.7B CNY (≈$5.0B) | 19 | 31 |
| 1,343 | 6.0B CNY (≈$841M) | 19 | 37 |
| 1,343 | 7.7B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 19 | 26 |
| 1,343 | 12.1B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 19 | 12 |