Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Zoom Communications, Inc.
How Zoom Communications, Inc. stacks up
ZM · against 478 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Growth
84/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #124 of 479 · scores higher than 73% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score70 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including ZM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 84?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Technology peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 8.5%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.8% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 181.7% vs peer median 11.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 496 reported | 5.0% | 13.1% | 24% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 286 reported | 181.7% | 22.4% | 85% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 471 reported | 3.8% | 9.7% | 33% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 1 | 4.0B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 965.7B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 1 | 1.4B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 124 | 216.3B USD | 84 | 64 | |
| 124 | 10.7B USD | 84 | 59 | |
| 124 | 2.0B USD | 84 | 70 | |
| 124 | 5.2B USD | 84 | 47 | |
| 124 | 26.8B USD | 84 | 85 | |
| 129 | 1.4B USD | 83 | 39 | |
| 129 | 308M USD | 83 | 62 | |
| 129 | 61.6B USD | 83 | 38 | |
| 129 | 343M USD | 83 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score