Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Lumentum Holdings Inc.
How Lumentum Holdings Inc. stacks up
LITE · against 1,668 other Technology companies
Growth
83/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #277 of 1,669 · scores higher than 83% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score167 peers with a growth score of 80–89, including LITE · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 83?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly thanks to its revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 86% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 19.5% vs peer median 4.8%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 97% of peers. Revenue growth: 83.2% vs peer median 8.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = LITE, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | LITE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,689 reported | 83.2% | 8.5% | 97% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,071 reported | Not reported | 11.1% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,659 reported | 19.5% | 4.8% | 86% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around LITE| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 241.8B CNY (≈$33.9B) | 100 | 85 | |
| 1 | 37.0B CNY (≈$5.2B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 40.5B USD | 100 | 75 | |
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 277 | 86.4B TWD (≈$2.7B) | 83 | 71 | |
| 277 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score