Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
How ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. stacks up
ZIM · against 548 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
100/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #1 of 549 · scores higher than 100% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score45 peers with a valuation score of 90–100, including ZIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 100?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 96.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 13.6% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 96% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 59.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 545 reported | 3.9% | 4.4% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 554 reported | 6.5% | 7.8% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 204 reported | 42.6% | 4.3% | 98% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 545 reported | 108.3% | 42.2% | 89% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2.8B EUR (≈$3.1B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 4 | 2.8B USD | 99 | 81 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score