Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
How ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. stacks up
ZIM · against 445 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Growth
3/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #442 of 446 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score18 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including ZIM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 3?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth, 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 97% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -77.7% vs peer median 7.1%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 95% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -18.1% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 92% of peers. Revenue growth: -18.1% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ZIM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ZIM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 462 reported | -18.1% | 8.4% | 4% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 328 reported | -77.7% | 9.2% | 3% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 437 reported | -18.1% | 5.2% | 2% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ZIM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 1 | 2.5B USD | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 727M USD | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 440 | 3.4B USD | 4 | 16 | |
| 442 | 6.2B USD | 3 | 34 | |
| 442 | 2M USD | 3 | 9 | |
| 442 | 390M USD | 3 | 26 | |
| 442 | 3.5B USD | 3 | 57 | |
| 446 | 379M USD | 0 | 8 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score