Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
ZBRA · against 184 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #157 of 185 · scores higher than 15% of peers · safety percentile 12
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)21 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including ZBRA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio, beta and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | ZBRA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 175 reported | 0.86× | 0.34× | 22% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 174 reported | 1.61 | 1.03 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 184 reported | 0.52× | 1.64× | 1% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 2 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 9.1B USD | 98 | 87 | |
| 4 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 5 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 153 | 11.9B USD | 14 | 50 | |
| 154 | 19.0B USD | 13 | 54 | |
| 155 | 65.8B CNY (≈$9.2B) | 13 | 46 | |
| 156 | 61.3B CNY (≈$8.6B) | 13 | 53 | |
| 157 | 15.6B USD | 12 | 48 | |
| 158 | 20.1B USD | 12 | 68 | |
| 159 | 361.8B TWD (≈$11.2B) | 12 | 32 | |
| 160 | 10.6B USD | 11 | 50 | |
| 161 | 12.4B USD | 10 | 44 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score