Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Yum China Holdings, Inc.
How Yum China Holdings, Inc. stacks up
YUMC · against 131 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
57/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #46 of 132 · scores higher than 66% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score15 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including YUMC · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 57?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 10.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = YUMC, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | YUMC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 130 reported | 5.7% | 4.6% | 67% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 134 reported | 10.5% | 7.8% | 70% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 5.8% | 5.5% | 56% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 127 reported | 31.8% | 27.1% | 56% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around YUMC| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 92 | 52 | |
| 42 | 9.5B USD | 60 | 66 | |
| 42 | 9.4B USD | 60 | 55 | |
| 44 | 16.1B USD | 59 | 66 | |
| 45 | 15.98T CLP (≈$17.6B) | 58 | 74 | |
| 46 | 16.2B USD | 57 | 62 | |
| 47 | 1.72T JPY (≈$11.7B) | 56 | 51 | |
| 48 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 55 | 41 | |
| 49 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 54 | 53 | |
| 49 | 526.8B ZAR (≈$29.0B) | 54 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score