Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
YUM · against 70 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #42 of 71 · scores higher than 39% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score18 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including YUM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | YUM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | 5.0% | 4.0% | 61% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 72 reported | 5.5% | 6.6% | 34% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 43 reported | 3.9% | 4.2% | 48% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 68 reported | -16.8% | 14.4% | 0% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 4 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 5 | 200.3B HKD (≈$25.6B) | 88 | 55 | |
| 39 | 83.8B USD | 36 | 52 | |
| 39 | 23.5B USD | 36 | 62 | |
| 42 | 44.1B USD | 35 | 35 | |
| 42 | 22.7B USD | 35 | 55 | |
| 42 | 42.8B USD | 35 | 54 | |
| 45 | 3.73T INR (≈$44.8B) | 34 | 64 | |
| 46 | 52.8B USD | 33 | 52 | |
| 46 | 29.9B USD | 33 | 49 | |
| 48 | 3.38T JPY (≈$23.0B) | 32 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score