Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Yum! Brands, Inc.
How Yum! Brands, Inc. stacks up
YUM · against 71 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #10 of 72 · scores higher than 82% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score30 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including YUM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 91% of peers. Return on invested capital: 29.2% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 98% of peers. Operating margin: 31.0% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 99% of peers. Return on assets: 25.5% vs peer median 3.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = YUM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | YUM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 67 reported | 29.2% | 18.7% | 73% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 73 reported | 31.0% | 11.4% | 97% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 68 reported | 25.5% | 7.8% | 97% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 63 reported | Not reported | 22.1% | — | — | Context only |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 73 reported | 45.3% | 39.4% | 63% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around YUM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 99 | 91 | |
| 1 | 24.9B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 1 | 72.8B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 1 | 24.1B USD | 99 | 63 | |
| 10 | 72.8B USD | 97 | 62 | |
| 10 | 23.5B USD | 97 | 62 | |
| 10 | 27.1B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 10 | 38.3B USD | 97 | 57 | |
| 10 | 42.8B USD | 97 | 54 | |
| 15 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 96 | 74 | |
| 15 | 81.9B USD | 96 | 45 | |
| 17 | 17.2B GBP (≈$22.4B) | 95 | 60 | |
| 18 | 216.5B HKD (≈$27.7B) | 94 | 76 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score