Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Viking Holdings Ltd
How Viking Holdings Ltd stacks up
VIK · against 1,603 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Profitability
97/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #42 of 1,604 · scores higher than 97% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score169 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including VIK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 97?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 89% of peers. Return on assets: 9.4% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 94% of peers. Return on invested capital: 40.1% vs peer median 7.3%
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 95% of peers. Operating margin: 23.1% vs peer median 6.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VIK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VIK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,510 reported | 40.1% | 7.3% | 94% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,601 reported | 23.1% | 6.4% | 95% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,528 reported | 9.4% | 3.3% | 89% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,476 reported | 139.6% | 7.7% | 99% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,613 reported | 44.3% | 30.2% | 72% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VIK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 880.5B TWD (≈$27.3B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 5.2B MYR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 84 | |
| 42 | 15.4B USD | 97 | 74 | |
| 42 | 72.8B USD | 97 | 62 | |
| 42 | 23.5B USD | 97 | 62 | |
| 42 | 27.1B USD | 97 | 58 | |
| 42 | 38.3B USD | 97 | 57 | |
| 42 | 965M USD | 97 | 50 | |
| 42 | 624M SGD (≈$474M) | 97 | 82 | |
| 42 | 42.8B USD | 97 | 54 | |
| 58 | 86.0B TWD (≈$2.7B) | 96 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score