Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Yelp Inc.
How Yelp Inc. stacks up
YELP · against 140 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Growth
45/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #73 of 141 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including YELP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 45?
Weighted metrics compared with all Communication Services companies.Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -1.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 3.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = YELP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | YELP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 142 reported | 1.5% | 2.4% | 47% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 79 reported | -1.4% | 6.2% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 139 reported | 5.1% | 3.7% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around YELP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15.2B HKD (≈$1.9B) | 99 | 64 | |
| 1 | 17.62T IDR (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 76 | |
| 1 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 71 | |
| 4 | 648M USD | 98 | 26 | |
| 4 | 1.57T ARS (≈$1.6B) | 98 | 74 | |
| 67 | 743M USD | 48 | 67 | |
| 70 | 1.1B EUR (≈$1.2B) | 47 | 61 | |
| 71 | 9.5B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 46 | 27 | |
| 71 | 1.94T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 46 | 68 | |
| 73 | 1.1B USD | 45 | 73 | |
| 74 | 1.90T KRW (≈$1.4B) | 44 | 73 | |
| 74 | 12.9B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 44 | 42 | |
| 74 | 7.3B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 44 | 40 | |
| 77 | 10.8B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 43 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score