Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xylem Inc.
How Xylem Inc. stacks up
XYL · against 182 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
67/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #76 of 183 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score21 peers with a growth score of 60–69, including XYL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 67?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth, which is stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 13.1% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 83% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.6% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XYL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XYL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 184 reported | 4.5% | 7.1% | 37% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 165 reported | 13.1% | 11.0% | 56% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 14.6% | 6.6% | 80% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XYL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 1 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 3 | 85.2B CNY (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 3 | 16.48T KRW (≈$11.9B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 5 | 18.35T KRW (≈$13.2B) | 97 | 56 | |
| 72 | 1.83T JPY (≈$12.5B) | 69 | 47 | |
| 72 | 11.3B EUR (≈$12.4B) | 69 | 52 | |
| 75 | 21.8B EUR (≈$24.0B) | 68 | 66 | |
| 76 | 29.8B EUR (≈$32.8B) | 67 | 54 | |
| 76 | 22.5B USD | 67 | 59 | |
| 76 | 15.2B USD | 67 | 74 | |
| 79 | 22.1B USD | 65 | 49 | |
| 79 | 146.2B SEK (≈$14.6B) | 65 | 67 | |
| 81 | 23.5B EUR (≈$25.8B) | 64 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score