Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Expro Ltd
How Expro Ltd stacks up
XPRO · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
51/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #188 of 386 · scores higher than 51% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including XPRO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.A mix: stronger 3-year revenue growth, but weaker revenue growth than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 68% of peers. Revenue growth: -6.2% vs peer median 0.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 0.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 77% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.9% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XPRO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XPRO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | -6.2% | 0.5% | 32% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 0.0% | 1.0% | 48% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 7.9% | -1.3% | 77% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XPRO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 184 | 2.7B USD | 52 | 50 | |
| 188 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 51 | 31 | |
| 188 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 51 | 65 | |
| 188 | 6.2B USD | 51 | 53 | |
| 188 | 1.5B USD | 51 | 51 | |
| 192 | 19.2B MYR (≈$4.2B) | 50 | 72 | |
| 192 | 11.7B USD | 50 | 71 | |
| 192 | 6.7B USD | 50 | 53 | |
| 192 | 2.92T INR (≈$35.0B) | 50 | 56 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score