Bringing the fundamentals into focus…

How ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation stacks up

XOM · against 1 other Energy companies of similar size

Profitability

64/ 100

Near the top of its peers.

Ranked #1 of 2 · scores higher than 100% of peers

Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score

1 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including XOM · Click a bar to see the companies

Why profitability scores 64?

Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.

Mainly thanks to its return on assets and return on invested capital, which are stronger than most Energy peers.

Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 15.9% vs peer median 12.0%
a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 70% of peers. Return on invested capital: 15.5% vs peer median 9.2%
a higher return on assets: stronger than 73% of peers. Return on assets: 7.1% vs peer median 4.5%

Metric by metric

Position: dot = XOM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.

Metric	XOM	Peer median	Better than	Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 2 reported	15.5%	16.0%	0%	33%
Operating marginHigher is better · 2 reported	15.9%	12.4%	100%	33%
Return on assetsHigher is better · 2 reported	7.1%	6.6%	100%	33%
Return on equityHigher is better · 2 reported	12.6%	12.4%	100%	Context only
Gross marginHigher is better · 2 reported	29.8%	37.0%	0%	Context only

Ranking by profitability score

Top 5 and the companies ranked around XOM

Rank	Company	Market cap	Profitability	Overall
1	ExxonMobil Holdings CorporationXOM · US-listed	674.6B USD	64	59
2	Chevron CorporationCVX · US-listed	402.4B USD	57	58

Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score