Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to XMax Inc.
How XMax Inc. stacks up
XMAX · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
32/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,049 of 1,553 · scores higher than 32% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including XMAX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 32?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. EBITDA yield: -1.4% vs peer median 8.8%
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Free cash flow yield: -1.7% vs peer median 6.1%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 92% of peers. Earnings yield: 11.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XMAX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XMAX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 11.9% | 4.4% | 92% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | -1.4% | 8.8% | 8% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | -1.7% | 6.1% | 18% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 39.5% | 57.2% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XMAX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,049 | 174.8B EUR (≈$192.3B) | 32 | 56 | |
| 1,049 | 3.0B AUD (≈$2.0B) | 32 | 43 | |
| 1,049 | 151.4B USD | 32 | 61 | |
| 1,049 | 12.1B USD | 32 | 57 | |
| 1,049 | 271M USD | 32 | 62 | |
| 1,065 | 16.3B CNY (≈$2.3B) | 31 | 63 | |
| 1,065 | 30.9B TWD (≈$957M) | 31 | 38 | |
| 1,065 | 2.9B CNY (≈$410M) | 31 | 49 | |
| 1,065 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 31 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score