Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
How Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stacks up
XHR · against 179 other Real Estate companies listed in US-listed
Growth
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #151 of 180 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score20 peers with a growth score of 20–29, including XHR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.6% vs peer median 3.0%
- Earnings per share turned from a profit to a loss. Earnings per share growth: — vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XHR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XHR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 182 reported | 1.6% | 5.9% | 31% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 326.7% | 13.9% | 94% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 174 reported | 1.5% | 4.8% | 30% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XHR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 3 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 4 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 4 | 34.7B USD | 98 | 45 | |
| 150 | 681M USD | 29 | 52 | |
| 151 | 4.2B USD | 28 | 18 | |
| 151 | 1.5B USD | 28 | 72 | |
| 151 | Unavailable | 28 | 33 | |
| 151 | 2.1B USD | 28 | 32 | |
| 155 | 2.4B USD | 27 | 52 | |
| 156 | 633M USD | 26 | 33 | |
| 156 | 2.0B USD | 26 | 24 | |
| 156 | 759M USD | 26 | 35 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score