Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Xcel Brands, Inc.
How Xcel Brands, Inc. stacks up
XELB · against 3 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
0/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #3 of 4 · scores higher than 0% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including XELB · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 0?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 100% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -42.4% vs peer median 4.3%
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 99% of peers. Revenue growth: -40.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = XELB, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | XELB | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 3 reported | -40.2% | -20.9% | 0% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1 reported | Not reported | -85.0% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 4 reported | -42.4% | -17.0% | 0% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around XELB| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21M MYR (≈$5M) | 29 | 68 | |
| 2 | 1M USD | 4 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3M CAD (≈$2M) | 0 | 19 | |
| 3 | 2M USD | 0 | 5 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score