Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Sono Group N.V.
How Sono Group N.V. stacks up
SSM · against 1,585 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Growth
4/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,515 of 1,586 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score151 peers with a growth score of 0–9, including SSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 4?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its earnings per share growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 98% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -85.0% vs peer median 4.2%
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 93% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -10.7% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = SSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | SSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 1,593 reported | Not reported | 3.7% | — | — | 33% |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 1,125 reported | -85.0% | 4.1% | 2% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 1,578 reported | -10.7% | 4.3% | 7% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around SSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 1.3B MYR (≈$277M) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 241M MYR (≈$53M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 177.5B INR (≈$2.1B) | 100 | ||
| 1,515 | 7.2B SEK (≈$718M) | 4 | 40 | |
| 1,515 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score