Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WTS · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Ranked #1,521 of 2,394 · scores higher than 36% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score240 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including WTS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Industrials peers.
| Metric | WTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 3.2% | 3.8% | 44% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 4.9% | 7.0% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | 2.9% | 3.7% | 42% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 18.2% | 50.5% | 15% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1,521 | 105.0B IDR (≈$7M) | 36 | 16 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1,521 |
| 11.4B AUD (≈$7.5B) |
| 36 |
| 39 |
| 1,521 | 4.0B GBP (≈$5.2B) | 36 | 63 |
| 1,521 | 73.1B USD | 36 | 47 |
| 1,521 | 12.0B USD | 36 | 69 |
| 1,545 | 282.5B KRW (≈$203M) | 35 | 25 |
| 1,545 | 4.5B CNY (≈$635M) | 35 | 38 |
| 1,545 | 2.0B CNY (≈$286M) | 35 | 41 |
| 1,545 | 4.8B CNY (≈$668M) | 35 | 47 |