Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WST · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #713 of 1,373 · scores higher than 48% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including WST · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.11× | 0.24× | 66% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.14 | 0.53 | 20% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 2.82× | 2.62× | 53% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 709 | 7.4B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 48 | 42 | |
| 710 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.2B CNY (≈$861M) |
| 48 |
| 35 |
| 711 | 62.5B SEK (≈$6.3B) | 48 | 60 |
| 712 | 31.1B TWD (≈$965M) | 48 | 63 |
| 713 | 28.6B USD | 48 | 60 |
| 714 | 7.7B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 48 | 56 |
| 715 | 35.0B USD | 48 | 52 |
| 716 | 7.0B USD | 48 | 63 |
| 717 | 1.26T INR (≈$15.1B) | 48 | 63 |