Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WST · against 88 other Healthcare companies of similar size
Ranked #28 of 89 · scores higher than 69% of peers · safety percentile 48
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including WST · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WST | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 86 reported | 0.11× | 0.46× | 81% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 85 reported | 1.14 | 0.80 | 21% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 83 reported | 2.82× | 1.80× | 73% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.0B USD | 93 | 28 | |
| 2 | 327.3B CNY (≈$45.8B) | 92 | 75 | |
| 3 | 56.7B USD | 85 | 79 | |
| 4 | 8.24T JPY (≈$56.0B) | 83 | 75 | |
| 5 | 25.8B USD | 83 | 75 | |
| 24 | 3.53T JPY (≈$24.0B) | 58 | 68 | |
| 25 | 43.30T KRW (≈$31.2B) | 55 | 68 | |
| 26 | 5.26T JPY (≈$35.8B) | 51 | 63 | |
| 27 | 27.5B NZD (≈$16.5B) | 50 | 69 | |
| 28 | 28.6B USD | 48 | 60 | |
| 29 | 35.0B USD | 48 | 52 | |
| 30 | 1.26T INR (≈$15.1B) | 48 | 63 | |
| 31 | 32.3B AUD (≈$21.3B) | 47 | 55 | |
| 32 | 22.3B SGD (≈$16.9B) | 45 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score