Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
How Williams-Sonoma, Inc. stacks up
WSM · against 89 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Valuation
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #61 of 90 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score19 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including WSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.5% vs peer median 8.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.5% vs peer median 6.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 87 reported | 3.8% | 4.4% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 92 reported | 5.5% | 7.3% | 25% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 51 reported | 4.5% | 4.5% | 52% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 85 reported | 6.3% | 21.0% | 17% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 219.5B CNY (≈$30.7B) | 98 | 66 | |
| 2 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 31.01T KRW (≈$22.3B) | 91 | 59 | |
| 58 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 34 | 53 | |
| 58 | 17.1B USD | 34 | 32 | |
| 58 | 3.73T INR (≈$44.8B) | 34 | 64 | |
| 61 | 52.8B USD | 33 | 52 | |
| 61 | 29.9B USD | 33 | 49 | |
| 63 | 3.38T JPY (≈$23.0B) | 32 | 67 | |
| 64 | 39.0B AUD (≈$25.7B) | 31 | 60 | |
| 64 | 57.0B USD | 31 | 52 | |
| 66 | 2.51T JPY (≈$17.1B) | 30 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score