Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
How Williams-Sonoma, Inc. stacks up
WSM · against 92 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
39/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #77 of 93 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score3 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including WSM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 39?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its 3-year revenue growth, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 72% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: -1.1% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 2.2% vs peer median 3.7%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 8.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WSM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WSM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 93 reported | 2.2% | 8.6% | 22% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 81 reported | 8.2% | 11.2% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 93 reported | -1.1% | 9.4% | 12% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WSM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 1 | 47.0B USD | 100 | 61 | |
| 4 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 4 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 73 | 4.66T JPY (≈$31.7B) | 43 | 61 | |
| 73 | 15.2B USD | 43 | 36 | |
| 73 | 89.1B AUD (≈$58.8B) | 43 | 41 | |
| 76 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 77 | 29.9B USD | 39 | 49 | |
| 78 | 16.8B USD | 31 | 46 | |
| 79 | 57.2B USD | 30 | 50 | |
| 80 | 283.2B SEK (≈$28.3B) | 27 | 41 | |
| 80 | 34.3B EUR (≈$37.7B) | 27 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score