Ranked #99 of 240 · scores higher than 58% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score
19 peers with a profitability score of 50–59, including WSFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Its metrics sit close to the Banks & Insurance norm.
●Return on equity is close to the peer norm. Return on equity: 11.8% vs peer median 10.7%
▲a higher return on assets: stronger than 63% of peers. Return on assets: 1.4% vs peer median 1.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WSFS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
WSFS
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 214 reported
66.7%
10.9%
92%
Context only
Operating marginHigher is better · 39 reported
Not reported
18.1%
—
—
Context only
Return on assetsHigher is better · 240 reported
1.4%
1.2%
59%
50%
Return on equityHigher is better · 239 reported
11.9%
10.3%
59%
50%
Gross marginHigher is better · 250 reported
0.0%
0.0%
0%
Context only
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
