Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WSE · against 501 other Technology companies listed in US-listed
Ranked #303 of 502 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)49 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including WSE · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and beta, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WSE | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 465 reported | 0.25× | 0.30× | 54% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 461 reported | 1.34 | 1.25 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 505 reported | 1.07× | 1.86× | 20% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 2 | 129M USD | 100 | 48 | |
| 3 | 5.4B USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 8.7B USD | 100 | ||
| 5 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 299 | 21.1B USD | 30 | 70 | |
| 300 | 1.59T USD | 30 | 66 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 301 |
| 343M USD |
| 30 |
| 56 |
| 302 | 7.3B USD | 29 | 50 |
| 303 | 10.6B USD | 29 | 68 |
| 304 | 736M USD | 29 | 28 |
| 305 | 679M USD | 29 | 43 |
| 306 | 4.2B USD | 29 | 68 |
| 307 | 6.5B USD | 29 | 66 |