Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
CGNT · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #1,206 of 1,698 · scores higher than 29% of peers · safety percentile 29
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 20–29, including CGNT · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | CGNT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.16× | 0.26× | 60% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 1.64 | 0.84 | 13% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 1.33× | 1.83× | 29% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 1,202 | 17.0B HKD (≈$2.2B) | 29 | 50 | |
| 1,203 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 80.2B CNY (≈$11.2B) |
| 29 |
| 45 |
| 1,204 | 736M USD | 29 | 28 |
| 1,205 | 598M EUR (≈$658M) | 29 | 43 |
| 1,206 | 679M USD | 29 | 43 |
| 1,207 | 4.2B USD | 29 | 68 |
| 1,208 | 151M EUR (≈$167M) | 29 | 56 |
| 1,209 | 2.4B SGD (≈$1.8B) | 29 | 72 |
| 1,210 | 3.8B CNY (≈$528M) | 29 | 54 |