Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.
How Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. stacks up
WMS · against 310 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
55/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #181 of 311 · scores higher than 41% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score45 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including WMS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.2% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.4% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 71% of peers. Revenue growth: 10.4% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WMS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WMS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 311 reported | 10.4% | 6.5% | 65% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 283 reported | 7.4% | 11.5% | 42% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 308 reported | 3.2% | 6.7% | 29% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WMS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 5.2B USD | 100 | 56 | |
| 3 | 6.1B USD | 99 | 55 | |
| 3 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 12.1B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 176 | 10.0B EUR (≈$10.9B) | 56 | 54 | |
| 176 | 6.7B USD | 56 | 69 | |
| 181 | 5.6B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 181 | 6.4B CHF (≈$7.4B) | 55 | 63 | |
| 181 | 10.3B USD | 55 | 57 | |
| 184 | 816.2B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 54 | 72 | |
| 184 | 85.4B SEK (≈$8.5B) | 54 | 50 | |
| 184 | 11.2B USD | 54 | 55 | |
| 184 | 15.6B USD | 54 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score