Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WMK · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #252 of 802 · scores higher than 69% of peers · safety percentile 69
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including WMK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WMK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 0.12× | 0.44× | 74% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.42 | 0.32 | 38% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 2.03× | 1.53× | 66% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 248 | 117.4B JPY (≈$798M) | 69 | 66 | |
| 249 | 16.3B CAD (≈$11.9B) | 69 | 49 | |
| 250 | 4.5B CNY (≈$634M) | 69 | 42 | |
| 251 | 3.3B CNY (≈$465M) | 69 | 32 | |
| 252 | 1.8B USD | 69 | 55 | |
| 253 | 18.1B EUR (≈$19.9B) | 69 | 62 | |
| 254 | 250.8B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 68 | 52 | |
| 255 | 3.5B SGD (≈$2.7B) | 68 | 64 | |
| 256 | 2.19T INR (≈$26.3B) | 68 | 59 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score