Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WMK · against 213 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #81 of 214 · scores higher than 62% of peers · safety percentile 69
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)22 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including WMK · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WMK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 206 reported | 0.12× | 0.36× | 72% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 210 reported | 0.42 | 0.35 | 41% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 203 reported | 2.03× | 1.81× | 60% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 3 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 176.3B JPY (≈$1.2B) | 98 | 75 | |
| 77 | 265.7B JPY (≈$1.8B) | 71 | 76 | |
| 78 | 10.4B CNY (≈$1.5B) | 70 | 53 | |
| 79 | 1.4B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 70 | 68 | |
| 80 | 2.9B USD | 70 | 57 | |
| 81 | 1.8B USD | 69 | 55 | |
| 82 | 250.8B JPY (≈$1.7B) | 68 | 52 | |
| 83 | 3.5B SGD (≈$2.7B) | 68 | 64 | |
| 84 | 6.6B CNY (≈$928M) | 68 | 36 | |
| 85 | 11.6B CNY (≈$1.6B) | 67 | 21 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score