Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WM · against 62 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #56 of 63 · scores higher than 11% of peers · safety percentile 9
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including WM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and current ratio, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 61 reported | 2.35× | 0.73× | 7% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 62 reported | 0.43 | 0.96 | 84% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 62 reported | 0.91× | 1.15× | 23% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.0B USD | 92 | 71 | |
| 2 | 53.7B USD | 89 | 56 | |
| 3 | 318.3B DKK (≈$47.7B) | 68 | 45 | |
| 4 | 101.3B USD | 66 | 65 | |
| 5 | 11.30T JPY (≈$76.8B) | 61 | 51 | |
| 52 | 71.0B USD | 10 | 68 | |
| 53 | 92.9B USD | 10 | 41 | |
| 54 | 103.7B GBP (≈$134.9B) | 10 | 59 | |
| 55 | 94.0B USD | 9 | 44 | |
| 56 | 93.8B USD | 9 | 47 | |
| 57 | 68.5B USD | 8 | 50 | |
| 58 | 73.1B USD | 4 | 47 | |
| 59 | 81.6B USD | 3 | 46 | |
| 60 | 91.3B USD | 3 | 45 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score