Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WKC · against 400 other Energy companies
Ranked #364 of 401 · scores higher than 9% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score38 peers with a profitability score of 0–9, including WKC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its return on assets, return on invested capital and operating margin, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
| Metric | WKC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | -2.6% | 9.3% | 10% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 398 reported | -0.1% | 11.7% | 12% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 391 reported | -2.7% | 4.4% | 9% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 384 reported | -12.3% | 10.5% | 8% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 2.7% | 33.2% | 3% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 360 | 4.2B EUR (≈$4.6B) | 10 | ||
| 364 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.9B CNY (≈$828M) |
| 9 |
| 24 |
| 364 | 677M AUD (≈$447M) | 9 | 37 |
| 364 | 1.8B USD | 9 | 4 |
| 364 | 1.9B USD | 9 | 20 |
| 368 | 810M AUD (≈$535M) | 8 | 34 |
| 368 | 2.5B USD | 8 | 41 |
| 368 | 750.1B INR (≈$9.0B) | 8 | 33 |
| 368 | 104M USD | 8 | 33 |