Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cactus, Inc.
How Cactus, Inc. stacks up
WHD · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
78/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #84 of 386 · scores higher than 78% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including WHD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -13.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 85% of peers. Revenue growth: 21.8% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 86% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WHD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WHD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 21.8% | 0.5% | 85% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -13.0% | 1.0% | 38% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 14.6% | -1.3% | 86% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WHD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 80 | 6.4B USD | 79 | 68 | |
| 84 | 4.3B USD | 78 | 47 | |
| 84 | 53.9B USD | 78 | 42 | |
| 84 | 12.6B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 84 | 4.3B USD | 78 | 60 | |
| 88 | 4.1B SAR (≈$1.1B) | 77 | 61 | |
| 88 | 614M MYR (≈$135M) | 77 | 49 | |
| 88 | 3.1B USD | 77 | 39 | |
| 88 | 1.8B USD | 77 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score