Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cactus, Inc.
How Cactus, Inc. stacks up
WHD · against 116 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
27/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #90 of 117 · scores higher than 22% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score16 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including WHD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 77% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.9% vs peer median 5.2%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 71% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.6% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 7.5% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WHD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WHD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | 1.9% | 5.2% | 20% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | 8.6% | 13.2% | 22% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 74 reported | 7.5% | 6.2% | 58% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 116 reported | 28.7% | 56.1% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WHD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 664.7B JPY (≈$4.5B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.6B USD | 97 | 85 | |
| 4 | 66.2B HKD (≈$8.5B) | 95 | 68 | |
| 4 | 6.4B USD | 95 | 68 | |
| 87 | 16.9B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 29 | 24 | |
| 87 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 29 | 34 | |
| 89 | 4.0B USD | 28 | 48 | |
| 90 | 2.5B USD | 27 | 41 | |
| 90 | 4.3B USD | 27 | 60 | |
| 92 | 3.1B USD | 26 | 39 | |
| 93 | 3.9B USD | 25 | 62 | |
| 93 | 4.9B CAD (≈$3.6B) | 25 | 49 | |
| 95 | 5.7B CAD (≈$4.1B) | 24 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score