Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
DKL · against 386 other Energy companies
Ranked #285 of 387 · scores higher than 26% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score38 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including DKL · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
| Metric | DKL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 5.4% | 5.8% | 48% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 6.0% | 12.4% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 3.8% | 6.0% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | -2.4% | 60.0% | 2% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 281 | 906M EUR (≈$997M) | 27 | 26 | |
| 281 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.3B USD |
| 27 |
| 60 |
| 285 | 9.1B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 27 |
| 285 | 6.5B MYR (≈$1.4B) | 26 | 38 |
| 285 | 3.1B USD | 26 | 39 |
| 285 | 73.2B USD | 26 | 44 |
| 289 | 3.9B USD | 25 | 62 |
| 289 | 404.0B BRL (≈$72.7B) | 25 | 39 |
| 289 | 28.7B USD | 25 | 37 |