Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cactus, Inc.
How Cactus, Inc. stacks up
WHD · against 115 other Energy companies of similar size
Growth
78/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #29 of 116 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including WHD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -13.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 85% of peers. Revenue growth: 21.8% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 86% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WHD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WHD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 119 reported | 21.8% | -0.2% | 84% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 95 reported | -13.0% | 2.4% | 39% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 114 reported | 14.6% | -1.2% | 82% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WHD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 3 | 4.1B USD | 98 | 60 | |
| 3 | 4.7B USD | 98 | 56 | |
| 3 | 5.2B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 25 | 5.1B EUR (≈$5.6B) | 80 | 71 | |
| 25 | 3.8B USD | 80 | 65 | |
| 28 | 6.4B USD | 79 | 68 | |
| 29 | 4.3B USD | 78 | 47 | |
| 29 | 4.3B USD | 78 | 60 | |
| 31 | 3.1B USD | 77 | 39 | |
| 32 | 4.7B USD | 76 | 40 | |
| 32 | 6.6B USD | 76 | 28 | |
| 32 | 3.9B USD | 76 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score