Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Cactus, Inc.
How Cactus, Inc. stacks up
WHD · against 187 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Growth
78/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #56 of 188 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score26 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including WHD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 78?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -13.0% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 85% of peers. Revenue growth: 21.8% vs peer median 0.5%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 86% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 14.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WHD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WHD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 192 reported | 21.8% | 7.9% | 80% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 141 reported | -13.0% | 2.9% | 37% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 186 reported | 14.6% | 1.0% | 80% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WHD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 2 | 228M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.1B USD | 99 | 50 | |
| 2 | 1.7B USD | 99 | 49 | |
| 5 | 3.7B USD | 98 | 61 | |
| 53 | 6.1B USD | 79 | 68 | |
| 56 | 3.8B USD | 78 | 47 | |
| 56 | 1.5B USD | 78 | 46 | |
| 56 | 11.7B USD | 78 | 68 | |
| 56 | 3.8B USD | 78 | 61 | |
| 60 | 3.0B USD | 77 | 39 | |
| 60 | 50.3B USD | 77 | 42 | |
| 62 | 1.7B USD | 76 | 61 | |
| 62 | 3.9B USD | 76 | 41 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score