Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
How Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc. stacks up
WH · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Valuation
35/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #1,003 of 1,553 · scores higher than 35% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including WH · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 35?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.8% vs peer median 8.8%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 4.4%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 5.5% vs peer median 6.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WH, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 3.5% | 4.4% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 6.6% | 8.8% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 5.5% | 6.1% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | 8.1% | 57.2% | 7% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WH| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1,003 | 183.9B INR (≈$2.2B) | 35 | 61 | |
| 1,003 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score