Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WH · against 261 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #197 of 262 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score23 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including WH · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | WH | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 261 reported | 3.5% | 5.3% | 29% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 265 reported | 6.6% | 9.3% | 28% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 128 reported | 5.5% | 6.3% | 39% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 264 reported | 8.1% | 42.7% | 9% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.6B GBP (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 61 | |
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 3 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 4 | 25.5B HKD (≈$3.3B) | 97 | 83 | |
| 4 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 194 | 75.5B CNY (≈$10.6B) | 36 | 56 | |
| 194 | 32.4B SEK (≈$3.2B) | 36 | 61 | |
| 194 | 8.6B GBP (≈$11.1B) | 36 | 45 | |
| 197 | 35.3B CNY (≈$4.9B) | 35 | 57 | |
| 197 | 5.9B USD | 35 | 36 | |
| 199 | 491.0B JPY (≈$3.3B) | 34 | 38 | |
| 200 | 10.9B SAR (≈$2.9B) | 33 | 46 | |
| 200 | 423.5B INR (≈$5.1B) | 33 | 55 | |
| 200 | 5.2B GBP (≈$6.8B) | 33 | 71 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score