Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Weatherford International plc
How Weatherford International plc stacks up
WFRD · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
33/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #258 of 386 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score39 peers with a growth score of 30–39, including WFRD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 33?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its revenue growth and earnings per share growth, which are weaker than most Energy peers.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 71% of peers. Revenue growth: -7.2% vs peer median 0.5%
- slower growth in earnings per share: weaker than 66% of peers. Earnings per share growth: -23.7% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: -0.1% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WFRD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WFRD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | -7.2% | 0.5% | 29% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -23.7% | 1.0% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | -0.1% | -1.3% | 55% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WFRD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 254 | 34.54T IDR (≈$2.1B) | 34 | 63 | |
| 254 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 34 | 59 | |
| 258 | 28.7B USD | 33 | 37 | |
| 258 | 297.1B USD | 33 | 53 | |
| 258 | 6.3B USD | 33 | 53 | |
| 261 | 1.9B USD | 32 | 18 | |
| 261 | 881M USD | 32 | 31 | |
| 261 | 6.0B AUD (≈$4.0B) | 32 | 57 | |
| 261 | 2.6B USD | 32 | 30 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score