Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Western Midstream Partners, LP
How Western Midstream Partners, LP stacks up
WES · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #96 of 386 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including WES · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its 3-year revenue growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Energy peers.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -6.9% vs peer median 1.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 82% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 11.9% vs peer median -1.3%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 82% of peers. Revenue growth: 18.0% vs peer median 0.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WES, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WES | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | 18.0% | 0.5% | 82% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | -6.9% | 1.0% | 45% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 11.9% | -1.3% | 82% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WES| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 92 | 3.9B USD | 76 | 72 | |
| 96 | 4.7B CNY (≈$664M) | 75 | 31 | |
| 96 | 1.29T INR (≈$15.5B) | 75 | 56 | |
| 96 | 306M USD | 75 | 48 | |
| 96 | 18.1B USD | 75 | 53 | |
| 100 | 68.4B THB (≈$1.9B) | 74 | 66 | |
| 100 | 12.7B NOK (≈$1.2B) | 74 | 48 | |
| 100 | 2.1B USD | 74 | 65 | |
| 100 | 2.1B USD | 74 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score