Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WEN · against 1,552 other Consumer Cyclical companies
Ranked #304 of 1,553 · scores higher than 80% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score156 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including WEN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | WEN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,527 reported | 9.1% | 4.4% | 83% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,593 reported | 8.9% | 8.8% | 51% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 594 reported | 19.1% | 6.1% | 88% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,536 reported | Not reported | 57.2% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 198.5B KRW (≈$143M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 1 | 623.0B KRW (≈$449M) | 100 | 65 | |
| 1 | 382.5B KRW (≈$275M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 412.0B KRW (≈$297M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 1 | 1.49T KRW (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 304 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.6B) | 80 | 53 | |
| 304 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 6.5B USD |
| 80 |
| 62 |
| 304 | 4.9B USD | 80 | 51 |
| 304 | 1.5B BRL (≈$267M) | 80 | 92 |
| 304 | 1.4B USD | 80 | 44 |
| 320 | 3.6B HKD (≈$462M) | 79 | 35 |
| 320 | 42.7B JPY (≈$290M) | 79 | 80 |
| 320 | 1.7B MYR (≈$370M) | 79 | 63 |
| 320 | 19.6B CNY (≈$2.7B) | 79 | 61 |