Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
WDS · against 40 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #14 of 41 · scores higher than 68% of peers · safety percentile 65
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)7 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including WDS · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | WDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 42 reported | 0.33× | 0.51× | 71% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 42 reported | -0.23 | 0.51 | 100% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 40 reported | 1.39× | 1.38× | 51% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 904.0B TWD (≈$28.0B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 22.9B USD | 95 | 72 | |
| 3 | 29.1B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 4 | 2.51T INR (≈$30.2B) | 82 | 76 | |
| 5 | 81.4B USD | 79 | 78 | |
| 10 | 266.1B CNY (≈$37.3B) | 70 | 61 | |
| 11 | 1.15T THB (≈$32.1B) | 68 | 53 | |
| 12 | 4.69T JPY (≈$31.9B) | 67 | 67 | |
| 13 | 31.6B USD | 67 | 56 | |
| 14 | 42.5B USD | 65 | 56 | |
| 15 | 32.3B EUR (≈$35.5B) | 65 | 59 | |
| 16 | 21.2B EUR (≈$23.3B) | 62 | 48 | |
| 17 | 66.8B USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 18 | 56.7B USD | 53 | 57 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score