Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Woodside Energy Group Ltd
How Woodside Energy Group Ltd stacks up
WDS · against 196 other Energy companies listed in US-listed
Profitability
70/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #63 of 197 · scores higher than 67% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score21 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including WDS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 70?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its operating margin, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 63% of peers. Return on assets: 2.8% vs peer median 4.4%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- a wider operating margin: stronger than 87% of peers. Operating margin: 34.9% vs peer median 11.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WDS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WDS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 190 reported | Not reported | 9.2% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 193 reported | 34.9% | 13.4% | 82% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 194 reported | 2.8% | 4.4% | 39% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 190 reported | 7.7% | 11.8% | 37% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 197 reported | 34.9% | 41.2% | 42% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WDS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.8B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 2 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 2 | 1.3B USD | 99 | 59 | |
| 2 | 960M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 3.1B USD | 98 | 66 | |
| 59 | 5.9B USD | 72 | 52 | |
| 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score