Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Valaris Limited
How Valaris Limited stacks up
VAL · against 400 other Energy companies
Profitability
69/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #124 of 401 · scores higher than 69% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score40 peers with a profitability score of 60–69, including VAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 69?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly thanks to its return on assets, which is stronger than most Energy peers.
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 71% of peers. Return on invested capital: 5.1% vs peer median 9.3%
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 11.3% vs peer median 11.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 96% of peers. Return on assets: 17.2% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VAL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 383 reported | 5.1% | 9.3% | 29% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 398 reported | 11.3% | 11.7% | 49% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 391 reported | 17.2% | 4.4% | 96% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 384 reported | 33.6% | 10.5% | 91% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 405 reported | 24.8% | 33.2% | 36% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VAL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.9B EUR (≈$7.6B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 22.9B USD | 100 | 72 | |
| 3 | 6.33T SAR (≈$1.71T) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 400M EUR (≈$440M) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 1.6B USD | 99 | 61 | |
| 120 | 88.6B USD | 70 | 40 | |
| 124 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score