Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Workday, Inc.
How Workday, Inc. stacks up
WDAY · against 92 other Technology companies of similar size
Valuation
52/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #47 of 93 · scores higher than 49% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including WDAY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 52?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 3.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 2.6% vs peer median 2.2%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 73% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 5.8% vs peer median 2.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = WDAY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | WDAY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 93 reported | 2.5% | 2.9% | 42% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 91 reported | 3.3% | 4.8% | 33% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 70 reported | 6.0% | 3.0% | 84% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 89 reported | 13.5% | 14.8% | 48% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around WDAY| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.5B USD | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.42T TWD (≈$44.0B) | 95 | 75 | |
| 3 | 3.89T JPY (≈$26.5B) | 94 | 73 | |
| 4 | 28.8B USD | 92 | 70 | |
| 4 | 35.5B USD | 92 | 80 | |
| 44 | 932.5B TWD (≈$28.9B) | 55 | 47 | |
| 44 | 32.8B USD | 55 | 66 | |
| 44 | 52.3B USD | 55 | 74 | |
| 47 | 28.4B USD | 52 | 50 | |
| 47 | 47.7B USD | 52 | 58 | |
| 49 | 72.9B CAD (≈$53.2B) | 51 | 51 | |
| 49 | 24.9B USD | 51 | 48 | |
| 51 | 45.7B USD | 50 | 34 | |
| 52 | 68.1B EUR (≈$74.9B) | 49 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score