Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
W · against 142 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #132 of 143 · scores higher than 6% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score11 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including W · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | W | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 140 reported | -2.2% | 4.7% | 5% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | 2.0% | 7.8% | 10% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 80 reported | 2.8% | 5.7% | 22% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 138 reported | -18.4% | 28.2% | 1% | Context only |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37.54T KRW (≈$27.0B) | 97 | 65 | |
| 1 | 150.1B HKD (≈$19.2B) | 97 | 79 | |
| 1 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 4 | 4.04T JPY (≈$27.5B) | 93 | 76 | |
| 5 | 70.6B CNY (≈$9.9B) | 92 | 52 | |
| 130 | 1.46T INR (≈$17.6B) | 15 | 54 | |
| 130 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 10.9B USD |
| 15 |
| 28 |
| 132 | 17.5B USD | 14 | 18 |
| 132 | 7.8B EUR (≈$8.6B) | 14 | 61 |
| 132 | 15.2B USD | 14 | 36 |
| 135 | 1.62T INR (≈$19.4B) | 13 | 65 |
| 136 | 8.8B USD | 12 | 55 |
| 137 | 15.2B USD | 10 | 57 |
| 138 | 27.4B USD | 9 | 23 |