Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Wayfair Inc.
How Wayfair Inc. stacks up
W · against 144 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
43/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #111 of 145 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including W · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- slower revenue growth over three years: weaker than 66% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 0.6% vs peer median 4.3%
- Earnings per share growth is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.1% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = W, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | W | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 145 reported | 5.1% | 7.2% | 36% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 126 reported | Not reported | 8.8% | — | — | 33% |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 144 reported | 0.6% | 9.1% | 18% | 33% |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around W| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 105 | 12.2B EUR (≈$13.4B) | 45 | 60 | |
| 108 | 1.40T JPY (≈$9.5B) | 44 | 61 | |
| 108 | 11.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 108 | 10.2B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 111 | 15.2B USD | 43 | 36 | |
| 112 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 113 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 41 | 41 | |
| 113 | 1.72T JPY (≈$11.7B) | 41 | 51 | |
| 115 | 11.0B EUR (≈$12.1B) | 39 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score